So last night I saw “Walking with Dinosaurs 3D” in theaters.
One word: Phenomenal.
This was, by far, one of THE most gorgeous animated animal
movies I have ever seen (especially in terms of dinosaurs). The animation was
incredible. The amount of intricate detail that was put into creating each
animal was unreal. And what’s even more amazing is the amount of variation they
put into creating each individual of a species while still making it
recognizable as that species, so they can tell one individual (or character)
from another. Even the fluid movements of each animal were realistic and the combination
of that with the visual appeal of beautiful real-life landscapes worked
perfectly. Hands down.
I also thought they did a good job introducing most of the dinosaurs,
with a little snippet on each taxon that showed up (a few being Pachyrhinosaurus, Gorgosaurus, Edmontosaurus, an ankylosaur of some sort, Troodon, and Alexornis—oh, and a pterosaur), although,
I wish they would have spent more time talking about each one like they did
with Gorgosaurus. He got a little
more informative attention for some reason. (And did anyone notice they didn't
introduce Parksosaurus at all?? Poor
guy. I like Parksosaurus!) I will
make a note to say, however, that it did feel slightly awkward because I could
never tell if I was watching a movie or a documentary. It was sort of this
weird purgatory between the two and it made me a little uncomfortable, but once
you get past that feeling, it is REALLY an enjoyable movie.
Now, I’m not going to go too much into the details of the
story, because it is pretty much more or less the same storyline you always see
in a dinosaur movie (which, let’s be honest, what else do they really have to
work with?). Cool looking plant-eating dinosaurs (in this case, the AWESOME Pachyrhinosaurus [perfect choice, by the
way]) are migrating from one place to another from season to season. They, of
course, keep running into carnivores along the way that the herbivores can’t
actually communicate with for whatever untold reason. Also, the main character,
Patchi the Pachyrhinosaurus, starts
off a small, dinky runt and apparently turns out to beat out the bully and
become the biggest badass dinosaur that ever walked the face of the earth.
That said, I mainly want to get into the discussion of the
fact that there were voiceovers:
Sorry to most of my paleontologist colleagues out there, but
I LIKED the voices.
Not to say it wasn’t annoying from time to time and some of
the dialogue was pretty much the cheesiest thing ever. BUT, nevertheless, it
was good that they put it in. Why? Because that is how movies work! If you’re
going to have a movie that is an hour and a half long, dialogue helps keep the
attention span. Not only for kids. For EVERYONE. If someone doesn’t pay attention
for even a couple minutes to a certain interaction two dinosaurs have with each
other that is important to the story line… that’s it. The rest of the story is
gone. Dialogue helps that keep moving to keep you on track.
Let me put it this way. How many of us loved Land Before
Time as a child? (And I’m talking about the original; not the crappy 50 other ones that
were made.) I know I loved it as a kid. And guess what? That stuff was nowhere
NEAR accurate, and yet it made me love dinosaurs that much more! And they
talked. A LOT. It’s a kid’s movie. Walking with Dinosaurs 3D is pretty much just a prettier, more accurate version of Land Before Time (with a debatably less fun storyline). Name me one GOOD animal movie that was at
least an hour and a half that didn’t have dialogue in it and we’ll talk. (Oh,
and it can’t have any humans in it talking either. OR written dialogue, like in
a silent movie, because guess what? THAT’S STILL DIALOGUE.)
Now, some people complain that their mouths weren’t moving
and they were somehow telepathically talking. Well, I’m sorry, but it’s much
better than them having lips and talking, like in Disney’s Dinosaur from years
ago. Dinosaurs don’t have lips. We all know this. (SCIENCE!) So, again, just to
make the movie run along better, dialogue helps it keep going. (Also, Homeward Bound was fantastic, and they were talking telepathically. So it's okay!) Now, maybe they
could have had a narrator talking, but that wouldn’t have been nearly as much
fun. I know I laughed quite a few times and the people around me laughed as
well throughout. It was funny! (Again, in a cheesy way, but still… THAT’S
OKAY!)
So, to sum up: GO SEE IT. Paleontologists and
non-paleontologists alike. It’s a great and fun movie for all ages. And to a
lot of my colleagues out there who don’t like the dialogue, it’s just for fun.
It’s a movie. It has nothing to do with the fact that they underestimate how
smart kids are in understanding a storyline with no dialogue. It is just a
matter of attention span. It’s human nature to zone out from time to time.
Words help keep you in check in most long stories. They didn’t just make this
movie for us paleontologists to be pleased with. They made it for everyone. And pretty much everyone I talked to who is not a paleontologist and who IS a movie lover agrees with how it was done. So just embrace it and have
fun with it! After all, this movie is going to influence so many more kids to
get into the field and into science in general!
Because, let's face it…What better way is there to get kids
interested in science at a really young age than exposing them to DINOSAURS?!
Peace out. I need to get back to writing my dissertation now. Hah!
~ Ali
Peace out. I need to get back to writing my dissertation now. Hah!
~ Ali
The ankylosaur is Edmontonia. When they decided they were going to put names on top of everything, they chose to just give it the generic "ankylosaur" instead, because they felt "Edmontonia" was too similar to "Edmontosaurus". (Victoria Arbour and I pushed them to use Panoplosaurus", but they didn't want to for some reason.)
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, poor Parksosaurus (or "those green guys", as the call them.)
Ah, I THOUGHT it was Edmontonia, but was confused as to why they didn't name it and figured it was an unnamed species I hadn't heard of. Ha! Thanks, Tom!
DeleteI dunno, I saw the trailer. If I didn't know better, I'd say the voices made my ears bleed as I tried to unhear it.
ReplyDeleteThe older trailer where there were no voices looked incredible. But once I heard the voices in the new one all the excitement just dissipated as I cringed.